The Future Combat Air System and the EU's Strategic Acquisition Malaise
Article link: https://cepa.org/the-future-combat-air-system-and-the-eus-strategic-autonomy-malaise/
- The Future Combat Air System was once hailed by President Macron as a "deep revolution" European defense cooperation
- This system is now in trouble due to familiar disagreements between France and Germany over IP and workshare
- FCAS woes illustrate the roadblocks on the EU's path towards strategic autonomy
- EU needs a greater level of autonomy in defense as the US turns towards the Indo-Pacific
- Work on the FCAS began in 2017
- Brexit
- Election of Donald Trump
- Sense in Europe that it couldn't rely on the two traditional Atlantic powers of the United States and United Kingdom to provide for European defense
- FCAS's goal was to create a single replacement for the competing Dassault Rafale and EuroFighter
- Reduce intra-EU competition
- Harmonize defense planning
- Increase interoperability among member states
- Improve the EU's ability to defend itself without relying on the US or UK
- But why is reduced competition a worthwhile goal?
- The lesson of the F-35 program in the US is that if your One Big System runs into delays or doesn't perform as well as expected, you end up in a situation where you have no good choices
- Moreover, why is the EU even investing in another generation of manned aircraft? Other mid-tier powers (like Australia) are already transitioning towards manned-unmanned teaming, with legacy manned systems acting as control nodes for more modern unmanned systems
- One of the goals that the FCAS was supposed to drive was consolidation of the EU's defense-industrial base
- Former European Defense Agency Chief Jorge Domecq linked consolidation with strategic autonomy
- Why do strategic autonomy and consolidation have to be linked?
- In fact, the progression of the US defense-industrial base argues for the opposite — that robust competition is key for having a healthy defense-industrial base
- It is possible to have cooperation without consolidation
- The FCAS is an example of a push towards greater cooperation in defense procurement in Europe
- However, progress has reached a familiar impasse
- February 2021: negotiations for the next phase of FCAS development fell through
- Development is now stalled indefinitely
- Two key sticking points
- Division of labor
- Intellectual property
- Dassault wants 50% of the total workshare of the FCAS program
- Airbus wants full access to Dassault's technology
- It's weird that this article is describing Airbus as German, when Airbus is almost as French as it is German
- Is the FCAS really a European problem or is it a problem between two French defense contractors who can't get along
- The situation has reached such an impasse that Dassault and Airbus are reportedly considering building their own independent technology demonstrator aircraft
- This dispute is emblematic of a lack of trust between Berlin and Paris
- Some Germans think that the French want to build a French aircraft with German money
- Some French think that the Germans want to build a German aircraft with French technology
- Given how much of a fiasco the EuroFighter program was, can you really blame them?
- The lack of progress towards consolidation is pervasive across EU
- Many initiatives, such as PESCO are little more than words on paper, without any real backing or institutional support from EU member states
- High degree of fragmentation in defense acquisition, with associated inefficiencies
- Until this fragmentation issue is resolved, strategic autonomy will remain out of reach
- FCAS may yet become successful
- The total project cost is projected to be at least €100 bn.
- Many argue that this project is "too big to fail" and that despite roadblocks, the system will get built
- I find it highly dubious that the article is conflating completion with success
- Of course, given how the Russians' stealth fighter is going, maybe that's not an unreasonable standard after all
- If the French and Germans can overcome their mistrust and cooperate, the FCAS can become a template for future EU-wide defense cooperation
- The failure of the FCAS would represent a significant blow to future armament cooperation efforts
- The EU needs to get out of the "one-big-program" mindset
- Shift towards open standards and interoperability, rather than forcing highly complex one-size-fits-all systems onto nations that don't want them
- Even the US military is starting to shift towards collections of smaller, cheaper, lighter, interoperable systems with its new frigate and bomber programs
- Why is it so bad if the France and Germany have their own fighter programs if the planes can share data and fire the same weapons?